<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Rejections Hurt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2006/09/19/when-rejections-hurt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2006/09/19/when-rejections-hurt/</link>
	<description>If you loved the book, read the blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LindaFormichelli</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2006/09/19/when-rejections-hurt/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>LindaFormichelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=90#comment-690</guid>
		<description>I agree that it&#039;s difficult when you get no response to a query. Is it because the editor is busy, the editor didn&#039;t like your idea, your query fell behind the staff refrigerator, the editor is on vacation...? Each one of situations would require a different response (follow up in a week or two, pitch a different idea, resend your query, wait it out...). We need to know!

I also agree with Diana that &quot;It&#039;s not me, it&#039;s them.&quot; It&#039;s so easy to think that editors are thinking about you 24 hours a day. YOU&#039;re thinking about you 24 hours a day. And editors are thinking about themselves 24 hours a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s difficult when you get no response to a query. Is it because the editor is busy, the editor didn&#8217;t like your idea, your query fell behind the staff refrigerator, the editor is on vacation&#8230;? Each one of situations would require a different response (follow up in a week or two, pitch a different idea, resend your query, wait it out&#8230;). We need to know!</p>
<p>I also agree with Diana that &#8220;It&#8217;s not me, it&#8217;s them.&#8221; It&#8217;s so easy to think that editors are thinking about you 24 hours a day. YOU&#8217;re thinking about you 24 hours a day. And editors are thinking about themselves 24 hours a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirio</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2006/09/19/when-rejections-hurt/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>sirio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=90#comment-687</guid>
		<description>The non-rejection rejections are the worst.
Tell me it&#039;s a dumb idea, tell me it&#039;s such a perfect idea you just ran it last week (this happened to me once, ouch!).
But when you don&#039;t answer the pitch, I don&#039;t know what to do.
Wait? Call? Follow up? Shrivel and have a martini?

To get rid of the sting, I try to think of one thing that I can do to bring myself forward. Whether it&#039;s checking out a class or getting started on another project. Just one thing. Then I give myself a break for the day (see martini).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The non-rejection rejections are the worst.<br />
Tell me it&#8217;s a dumb idea, tell me it&#8217;s such a perfect idea you just ran it last week (this happened to me once, ouch!).<br />
But when you don&#8217;t answer the pitch, I don&#8217;t know what to do.<br />
Wait? Call? Follow up? Shrivel and have a martini?</p>
<p>To get rid of the sting, I try to think of one thing that I can do to bring myself forward. Whether it&#8217;s checking out a class or getting started on another project. Just one thing. Then I give myself a break for the day (see martini).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianaBurrell</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2006/09/19/when-rejections-hurt/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>DianaBurrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=90#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Great post, Linda! As you know, I get over rejections pretty quickly. In fact, I just confessed to a writer friend on Monday that I have somewhat high self esteem when it comes to my career. That is, I can&#039;t fathom why an editor would diss my writing or ignore me, which leads me to think, &quot;He&#039;s a moron. I deserve better than that.&quot; (Luckily, I&#039;ve never had an editor diss my writing, but plenty have ignored me.) And that leads me to my next point: it&#039;s rarely about me. It&#039;s about them -- they&#039;re ignoring &quot;me&quot; because they&#039;re swamped and don&#039;t have time to say, &quot;No thanks&quot; or just maybe my e-mail&#039;s moldering in their spam filter. There are always a million ways to take something personally -- but it&#039;s words, not me they&#039;re rejecting. Does that make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Linda! As you know, I get over rejections pretty quickly. In fact, I just confessed to a writer friend on Monday that I have somewhat high self esteem when it comes to my career. That is, I can&#8217;t fathom why an editor would diss my writing or ignore me, which leads me to think, &#8220;He&#8217;s a moron. I deserve better than that.&#8221; (Luckily, I&#8217;ve never had an editor diss my writing, but plenty have ignored me.) And that leads me to my next point: it&#8217;s rarely about me. It&#8217;s about them &#8212; they&#8217;re ignoring &#8220;me&#8221; because they&#8217;re swamped and don&#8217;t have time to say, &#8220;No thanks&#8221; or just maybe my e-mail&#8217;s moldering in their spam filter. There are always a million ways to take something personally &#8212; but it&#8217;s words, not me they&#8217;re rejecting. Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
