<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Query That Rocked for Writer&#8217;s Digest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2010/02/05/query-that-rocked-for-writers-digest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2010/02/05/query-that-rocked-for-writers-digest/</link>
	<description>Living and loving the freelance life—on your own terms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reading &#8211; February 7, 2010 &#124; All Freelance Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2010/02/05/query-that-rocked-for-writers-digest/comment-page-1/#comment-172773</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reading &#8211; February 7, 2010 &#124; All Freelance Writing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=1662#comment-172773</guid>
		<description>[...] Query That Rocked for Writer&#8217;s Digest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Query That Rocked for Writer&#8217;s Digest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LindaFormichelli</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2010/02/05/query-that-rocked-for-writers-digest/comment-page-1/#comment-172574</link>
		<dc:creator>LindaFormichelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=1662#comment-172574</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all your comments! Okay, I&#039;ll see if I can dig out that article and post it on the blog, though it might be out of date.

Rebecca, have you followed up? I usually follow up on queries after 2-3 weeks no matter what their guidelines or Writer&#039;s Digest say their response time is.

Dan, glad to be of help in the year 2010...thanks for your note!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all your comments! Okay, I&#8217;ll see if I can dig out that article and post it on the blog, though it might be out of date.</p>
<p>Rebecca, have you followed up? I usually follow up on queries after 2-3 weeks no matter what their guidelines or Writer&#8217;s Digest say their response time is.</p>
<p>Dan, glad to be of help in the year 2010&#8230;thanks for your note!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2010/02/05/query-that-rocked-for-writers-digest/comment-page-1/#comment-172568</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=1662#comment-172568</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to read this one too! If you can&#039;t post it in full, could you let us know which issue it appeared in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to read this one too! If you can&#8217;t post it in full, could you let us know which issue it appeared in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2010/02/05/query-that-rocked-for-writers-digest/comment-page-1/#comment-172548</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=1662#comment-172548</guid>
		<description>This is only the second post i&#039;ve read on your blog (sorry - I&#039;ve only just discovered your blog!), yet it is the second one to also have helped me.

It is only within the past few weeks that I have begun to look into magazine writing and so this, as basic as it may be to some, has give me a good idea of what I should be including in or how I should be laying out the initial query.

On something a little more humorous, did anyone else notice the phrase &quot;in the year 2000?&quot;.

I remember prior to 2000, no one really had any idea what to call it and &quot;the year 2000&quot; was used quite a lot.

I know it makes sense, but it sounds a bit too formal for every day use (or at least for me it does!).

The year 2010, darling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only the second post i&#8217;ve read on your blog (sorry &#8211; I&#8217;ve only just discovered your blog!), yet it is the second one to also have helped me.</p>
<p>It is only within the past few weeks that I have begun to look into magazine writing and so this, as basic as it may be to some, has give me a good idea of what I should be including in or how I should be laying out the initial query.</p>
<p>On something a little more humorous, did anyone else notice the phrase &#8220;in the year 2000?&#8221;.</p>
<p>I remember prior to 2000, no one really had any idea what to call it and &#8220;the year 2000&#8243; was used quite a lot.</p>
<p>I know it makes sense, but it sounds a bit too formal for every day use (or at least for me it does!).</p>
<p>The year 2010, darling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.therenegadewriter.com/2010/02/05/query-that-rocked-for-writers-digest/comment-page-1/#comment-172484</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therenegadewriter.com/?p=1662#comment-172484</guid>
		<description>Linda, you&#039;ve hooked me! I&#039;d love to read the full piece. I know you sometimes post articles as blog posts if you&#039;ve retained the rights to do, and if that&#039;s the case with this one, then please, pretty please, share it with us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda, you&#8217;ve hooked me! I&#8217;d love to read the full piece. I know you sometimes post articles as blog posts if you&#8217;ve retained the rights to do, and if that&#8217;s the case with this one, then please, pretty please, share it with us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

